A new vision for Israel, Palestinians and the Middle East

A Paperback Book by David Naggar

 
 
 

Times change. A larger Israel was once embraced by the world and considered “moderate and proper” by the future King of Syria and Iraq—the great uncle of Jordan’s King Abdullah [see map p. 183]. It is now viewed with antipathy.

Today’s current international consensus solution, two states—one Israeli, one Palestinian—within the confines of Israel and the territories—is based on flawed assumptions.

Even if two such states could be delineated by fiat, doing so would not produce a lasting peace. It would endanger the lives of some, and ruin the lives of many—Palestinians and Israelis alike.

Hopefully this book will help refocus the international debate away from how to implement an unworkable two-state solution and toward a debate about the size Israel (and possibly a Palestinian State) should be, in order to be self-sustaining and viable in the long run.

 

“We Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement. Our delegation here in Paris is fully acquainted with the proposals submitted yesterday by the Zionist organization to the Peace Conference, and we regard them as moderate and proper.”                

                                                              — Emir Faisal to the 1919 Paris Peace Conference

Purchase your copy today at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, or your local book store.

ALL LINKS BELOW WILL DOWNLOAD A CORRESPONDING PDF FILE

Download the full table of contents, preface and the first two pages of each chapter of  The Case for a Larger Israel (also the full appendix A and end notes).

Go to my blog. Every month (or so) I tie in current news events with the reasons for a larger Israel.

Today, most people are instinctively dismissive of any person who calls for a larger Israel. So I may have some work to do to convince you to read this book rather than setting it aside.


I do wholeheartedly support Israel, but let me assure you that this book is not the work of a “we’re right, they’re wrong” advocate. It is not hateful in tone. And after reading it, it is not a book about which you can easily say, “but it can never happen.”


The book invites peacemakers, negotiators and you to think outside of the box because current approaches to bring peace to the region are not working.


David Naggar